top of page
Post: Blog2_Post

An artificial state with nuclear weapons. How PAK is threat to the world?

The disruptions caused by partition in 1947 to India and creation of articial state called Pakistan, had a significant impact on both the military and civil bureaucracy. Pakistan experienced a succession of politicians during its initial political and economic crises. These politicians were often corrupt, prioritizing their political power and the interests of the elite, which diminished the prospects for a democratic state that could ensure socio-economic justice and equitable administration for all citizens. Controversies surrounding the national language, the role of Islam, provincial representation, and the distribution of power between the central government and provinces hindered the drafting of a constitution and delayed general elections.

In October 1956, a consensus was reached, leading to the declaration of Pakistan's first constitution. However, the democratic experiment was brief and tumultuous, with ministries frequently changing hands. In October 1958, just before national elections were set to occur, General Mohammad Ayub Khan executed a military coup with surprising ease. Between 1958 and 1971, President Ayub Khan centralized the government through autocratic rule, avoiding the instability of ministerial coalitions that had plagued the early years post-independence. He forged an alliance between a predominantly Punjabi military and civil bureaucracy, a small but powerful industrial class, and segments of the landed elite, replacing the parliamentary system with Basic Democracies. This system was based on Ayub Khan's belief that the chaotic behavior of politicians had negatively impacted Pakistan, leading him to disqualify all previous politicians under the Elective Bodies Disqualification Order of 1959 (EBDO).


By involving the civil bureaucracy in electoral politics, Ayub Khan aimed to strengthen central authority and support American-led initiatives for Pakistan's economic growth. However, his policies intensified existing inequalities both between and within provinces, amplifying the grievances of the eastern region and jeopardizing the centralized control Khan sought to establish. In West Pakistan, while there were significant achievements in productivity, these were overshadowed by increasing disparities in the agricultural sector, lack of representation, a challenging urbanization process, and the concentration of wealth among a few industrial entities. Following the 1965 conflict with India, rising regional dissatisfaction in East Pakistan and urban unrest in West Pakistan contributed to the erosion of Ayub Khan's power, ultimately leading to his resignation in March 1969.


Pakistan has faced significant challenges in establishing its identity both politically and culturally. Initially founded as a parliamentary democracy with secular principles, it has undergone numerous military coups (whom the west always supported), leading to an increasing emphasis on Sunni Islamic values as a benchmark for political leadership. Additionally, regions in northern Pakistan, especially Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, previously known as Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), have become sanctuaries for various militant Islamist factions, including the Taliban from Afghanistan, particularly following the U.S. invasion in 2001. Throughout the country, there have been sporadic outbreaks of ethnic, religious, and social conflicts, often rendering these regions nearly ungovernable by central authorities, with a notable rise in violence against religious minorities.


During the 1947 partition, approximately 10 million Muslim refugees fled India for Pakistan, with around 8 million settling in West Pakistan. Conversely, a similar number of Hindus and Sikhs were displaced from their homes in what is now Pakistan and migrated to India. Unlike previous migrations that unfolded over centuries, this mass displacement occurred within a single year, leaving a lasting impact on the subcontinent's dynamics and fueling ongoing rivalries between the two nations.

Pakistan and India have engaged in four wars all of them were won by India over coward Pakistani leaders and it's misguided armed forces. Three of the wars (1948–49, 1965, and 1999) were centered around the Kashmir dispute which Pakistan tried to grab by force despite the Maharaja of Kashmir signing it's accession to India. Since 1998, both nations have also acquired nuclear capabilities, with Pakistani nuclear weapons indicating, a feeling of a spoiled brat holding a gun in his hand as it does not has any 'no first use' policy unlike India and it's repetitive threat to India. Pakistan has always threatened India of a nuclear attack and used it's position as a nuclear state to get the world involved in the dispute with India.

It's state sponsored terrorists, intelligence agency and army (often interlinked) has leveraged the issues with India to get funds from different countries (previously US and now China) and common people of Pakistan. It uses the money donated by people in the Madrasas and by selling drugs in the world including in India, for sponsoring terrorism. Many of its army and intelligence personnel work with terrorirsts groups full time and the mastermind of 26/11 terror attack in Mumbai Hafiz Saeed and it's allies move in state sponsored security in Pakistan. If the world keeps on ignoring this threat, the day is sooner that they might start biting the world, as they keep harming India and the regional security.


Some examples on Pakistan's linkage to terrorism


  • Pakistan was put on the Financial Action Task Force’s (FATF) list of jurisdictions under increased monitoring, more commonly known as the “Grey List,” in 2018 uptill 2022.

  • 9/11 (attacks in America in 2001) mastermind Osama bin Laden, was killed by US forces in May 2011 in Abbottabad, Pakistan.

  • In April 2025, in an interview given to Yalda Hakim (Sky News), Paksitani defence minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif on record confessed to supporting terrorism, allegedly "for US, Britain and west against USSR", which was confirmed again by it's ex foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto.

  • 26/11 (attacks in Mumbai in 2008) mastermind Hafiz Saeed lives under state protection in Pakistan.

According to UN, in 2005, Hafiz Saeed identified the deployment locations for graduates of a Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (LeT- terror group) camp in Pakistan and personally coordinated the infiltration of LeT militants into Iraq during a visit to Saudi Arabia. By 2006, he was responsible for overseeing the operations of a terrorist camp, which included securing funding for its activities. Additionally, Saeed facilitated the appointment of a LeT operative to Europe to serve as the organization's fundraising coordinator. In June 2006, he established a LeT office in Quetta, Pakistan, to support the Taliban's operations in Afghanistan. Hafiz Muhammad Saeed has been in the custody of the Government of Pakistan since 12 February 2020, serving a 78-year prison sentence following his conviction in seven cases related to terror financing.

The list is very long....with several confessions, allegations, findings not only by the India but by different people, organizations and countries across the world, establishing Pakistan's involvement with terrorism.


The world and different organizations, societies, activists need to realise that whenever India has said that Pakistan is a rogue nation, it's not because of it's dispute with India over Kashmir but because the state in Pakistan isn't rational and only needs one unruly leader to start attacking the regional security and ethnic groups (like its army chief Asim Munir) and the propaganda of nuclear war.



Get membership to feature your article. Check here.

留言

評等為 0(最高為 5 顆星)。
暫無評等

新增評等
Get membership to get you article featured
Subscribe

Publish your post, become member today

Disclaimer - All the content written on the website is for general information purposes only. We don't want to hurt anyone's sentiments of any kind. While we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk. The blog or any content written on the website is opinion-based and that these opinions do not reflect the ideas, ideologies, or points of view of any organization. The information on blog is authentic to the best of our knowledge, and as such, it is prone to errors and the absence of some key information. The content on blog is generated for entertainment and informative purposes, but not to be perceived as professional advice in regards to health or finances, or any other field. 

In no event will we be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website. Through this website you are able to link to other websites which are not under the control of thesoulguide.co.in.. We have no control over the nature, content and availability of those sites. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them. Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, thesoulguide.co.in takes no responsibility for, and will not be liable for, the website being temporarily unavailable due to technical issues beyond our control.

We bring the handpicked topics and Indian perspective to various issues which might get missed by mainstream TV and print media, for a common reader. Subscribe Now to get latest updates. Get membership to feature your article.

Subscribe to YouTube Channel
bottom of page